Intelligence · Think
Research
A defensible reading of the literature.
Synthesise published work into an evidence graph that separates what is established from what is contested.
What is Research?
A literature summary that reads smoothly is usually hiding the disagreements. Research builds an evidence graph instead: what has been claimed, by whom, supported by what, and where the field disagrees with itself. Patents and datasets sit alongside publications, and reproducibility signals are surfaced rather than assumed — so the output supports a judgement rather than substituting for one.
Problems it solves
- Synthesise a body of literature on a question
- See where the field genuinely disagrees
- Include patents and datasets alongside publications
- Surface reproducibility signals
- Keep every claim attached to its source
Key capabilities
- Literature Synthesis
- Gather published work on a question and separate what is established from what is contested.
- Evidence Trail
- Every figure carries the record it came from, so a reader can check the answer instead of trusting it.
- Fact / Inference Separation
- Keep what is known, what is inferred and what is alleged visibly distinct.
- Confidence Ceilings
- Confidence is capped by the strength of the underlying basis, so a weak source cannot produce a strong-sounding claim.
- Agentic Investigation
- Specialist agents pursue a question through several controlled steps rather than answering in one pass.
How it is built
- Evidence graph
- Claims, sources and support are a structure, not a paragraph.
- Disagreement preserved
- Contested findings stay contested in the output.
- Beyond publications
- Patents and datasets are part of the landscape.
How it works
How the work is structured, and what each step's output rests on.
Frame the question
SourceState what is being asked precisely.
Gather sources
SourceCollect publications, patents and datasets.
Extract claims
ObservedRecord what each source actually claims.
Build the graph
AI-inferredConnect claims, support and contradiction.
Report with disagreement intact
AI-inferredSeparate established from contested.
Example use cases
Each example has its own page you can read and share.
Research
Map a technology landscape
Build a picture of a technical field including patents and datasets, with disagreement preserved.
5 minute walkthrough
- Literature Synthesis
- Evidence Trail
- Fact / Inference Separation
Research
Synthesise evidence on a specific question
Assemble what is known on a question, with reproducibility signals surfaced.
5 minute walkthrough
- Literature Synthesis
- Confidence Ceilings
- Evidence Trail
Research
Investigate the patent and publication landscape
Read patents and publications together to see where a field is actually moving.
4 minute walkthrough
- Literature Synthesis
- Evidence Trail
Ask Research
Illustrative examples. Results depend on your own data.
- “What is the state of evidence on this question?”
- “Where does the literature disagree?”
- “Which findings have been reproduced?”
- “What does the patent landscape look like here?”
Security, governance and human control
Where the software deliberately limits itself.
Governance
- Contested findings are not flattened into consensus
- Every claim linked to its source
Questions
- Does it write my literature review?
- It builds the evidence structure and keeps disagreement visible. The argument is yours to make.
Related applications
Teams using Research often want these too.
DeepQuery
Ask your databases a question, in words.
Capabilities
- Natural-Language Query
- Cross-Source Intelligence
- Evidence Trail
- Agentic Investigation
BioDiscovery
Compare candidate structures before committing bench time.
Capabilities
- Structure Analysis
- Property Screening
- Evidence Trail
- Confidence Ceilings
Start with Research
Intelligence is one of 9 categories, each its own subscription; Clearception One includes them all.