Simulation demo
Attribute the difference between two runs
Compare runs and identify which configuration change produced the difference.
The challenge
Two runs differ and it is unclear whether the cause is the design change or a setup change.
The scenario
A design iteration shows improvement, and the team must confirm it is not a meshing artefact.
What goes in
- Two runs
- The runs being compared, with their configurations.
What you can ask
Illustrative prompts. Results depend on your own data and are not deterministic.
- “What changed between these two runs?”
- “Is this a real difference or a mesh artefact?”
- “Which assumption differs?”
How Clearception approaches it
How the work is structured. Each step shows what its output is grounded in.
Diff the configurations
ObservedIdentify every difference between the setups.
Attribute the change
AI-inferredDetermine which difference plausibly produced the result change.
What you get
The shape of what comes back — not a promised result.
Run comparison
AI-inferredConfiguration differences with their likely contribution.
Why it matters
- Real improvements confirmed
- Design gains are distinguished from setup artefacts.
Related demos
Simulation
Turn a described problem into a solver setup
Produce a configuration with every assumption recorded as part of the run.
4 minute walkthrough
- Simulation Setup
- Evidence Trail
Simulation
Read a result against its assumptions
Interpret output in light of the setup that produced it, including what it cannot show.
3 minute walkthrough
- Simulation Setup
- Confidence Ceilings
- Evidence Trail
Robotics
Plan a task, bounded by the safety plane
Turn a described goal into a task plan that the deterministic safety plane must accept before it runs.
4 minute walkthrough
- Deterministic Safety Plane
- Deterministic Policy Engine
- Evidence Trail
Want to try this with your own work?
Open Simulation and bring your own data. No signup is needed to read these demos.