Molecule demo
Compare molecules on stated properties
Compare candidates on the properties that matter, with method and confidence attached to every value.
The challenge
Computed and measured properties get displayed identically, which quietly misleads.
The scenario
A shortlist mixes literature values and fast computations, and the difference matters.
What goes in
- Candidates
- The molecules being compared.
- Target properties
- What matters for this programme.
What you can ask
Illustrative prompts. Results depend on your own data and are not deterministic.
- “Compare these on solubility and stability.”
- “Which values are computed rather than measured?”
- “What method produced this number?”
How Clearception approaches it
How the work is structured. Each step shows what its output is grounded in.
Gather values
SourceCollect known and computed properties, recording method.
Compare
ObservedAssess candidates on the stated properties.
Mark provenance
AI-inferredKeep computed and measured visibly distinct.
What you get
The shape of what comes back — not a promised result.
Property comparison
ObservedCandidates side by side with method and confidence per value.
Why it matters
- No false equivalence
- An approximation never looks like a measurement.
Related demos
Molecule
Record why a candidate was deprioritised
Keep the reasoning behind each inclusion and exclusion with the programme.
3 minute walkthrough
- Property Screening
- Evidence Trail
- Confidence Ceilings
Materials
Screen candidates against target properties
Assess every candidate the same way and rank with confidence bounded by method.
3 minute walkthrough
- Property Screening
- Confidence Ceilings
- Evidence Trail
Molecule
Compare candidate synthesis routes
Compare routes to the same target on step count, conditions and recorded precedent.
4 minute walkthrough
- Structure Analysis
- Property Screening
- Evidence Trail
Want to try this with your own work?
Open Molecule and bring your own data. No signup is needed to read these demos.